Duel (DM2)
dag
vs
reppie
10 minutes, Deathmatch 3
Sun 15 June 2003 on QH-LAN 1on1 server
ping pl frags name Kills Deaths RA YA
13 0 5 reppie 6 6 9 4
12 0 3 dag 4 8 16 6
26 0 spec reppiedag 0 0 0 0
25 0 spec dag•cam 0 0 0 0
22 0 spec cam_qh 0 0 0 0
27 0 spec dREk•qh-cam 0 0 0 0
53 0 spec CAM•dag-reppie 0 0 0 0
Award Score Winner(s)
Frag Streak 5 reppie
Sunday 04 Jan 2004, 18:54
#1:
deh
can dag play aero!?
Sunday 04 Jan 2004, 19:00
#2:
: (
hehe
he cant play aero or skull :(
Sunday 04 Jan 2004, 19:51
#3:
vladde
Oh this is reppies second chance..remember dag won him first time 2-0
Sunday 04 Jan 2004, 22:34
#4:
Cholo
he seems more relax in 2nd chance. he was so damn nervous in their 1st game.
Sunday 04 Jan 2004, 22:40
#5:
phil
dag left the 1v1 tourney even though he wasnt eliminted, just put into LB...

i mean i guess its pretty unfair to have to play the same 2 ppl in the double elim tourney after u have beat them already in group games...

but to just quit the tourney cause of that, i dunno.. weird :)

btw *SPOILER* reppie beat griffin in WB too... well see what happens in final tomorrow
Sunday 04 Jan 2004, 23:42
#6:
-===[bit]==-
man i think in some way Dag is rigth...

playing and playin vs same oponnet is tedius..

dag havent more motivation to beat again reppie and again...

somthing was wrong i thnk..

regards
Monday 05 Jan 2004, 00:42
#7:
deh
reppie is a machine
Monday 05 Jan 2004, 00:49
#8:
nn
Only makes me wonder why he didn't quit when he was told he's gonna play reppie again, but after losing to him. Maybe he felt reppie is too tough now and no chance in winning him in the final.
Monday 05 Jan 2004, 01:17
#9:
Anonymous
Funny how dag has an official 3wins 2loss map record vs Reppie on QH-LAN, and it is Reppie that moved on. The tournament rules are a bit retarded in this respect. Dag defeated Reppie 2-0 and Fifi 2-0 to achieve a better seed that was suppose to translate to getting easier opponnents and them having to fight more difficult ones. Once the double elimination round started he would have had to play Reppie followed by Fifi again, which is bizzarre to say the least.
Monday 05 Jan 2004, 01:29
#10:
deh
Who the fuck cares, it was quite clearly he was outplayed by reppie the 2nd time (the one that matterd).
Monday 05 Jan 2004, 01:37
#11:
Cholo
i think he just quit cuz he knew he wasn't gonna win this qhlan tournament after playing reppie and what a better way to out of the tournament instead of staying and losing his title by losing now he can say he just quit cuz he was starving to dead which to mean sounds retarded as hell but o well.
Monday 05 Jan 2004, 01:38
#12:
cholo
mean = me
Monday 05 Jan 2004, 02:49
#13:
sexC
well like dag said himself, he could've just gone for a meal instead of playing reppie/fifi in the first place, he would still have had the same outcome in the winner brackets...
Monday 05 Jan 2004, 03:12
#14:
Goljat
reppie lost his group semifinal game, thats why he was seeded as 3 or 4, dunno why dag played again reppie. That sounds pretty stupid and boring.
Monday 05 Jan 2004, 07:43
#15:
Vld
deh wrote "the one that matterd" (his spelling).
Both reppie and dag though before playing first time that it was single elimination and that loser leaves the tournament.
I think its tiring to play one good player after another in the group games. Then when winning group has to play one of the best.
I dont think he has the streight to start all over again.
The qhlan schedule is very stressed and when being a 1on1,2on2,4on4 player thats exhausting.
Monday 05 Jan 2004, 08:27
#16:
serox
who won the 1v1? 2v2? and 4v4 please? not got java plugin at work so cant find info anywhere.


thnx
Monday 05 Jan 2004, 10:28
#17:
Goljat
finals start tonight at >20
Monday 05 Jan 2004, 11:05
#18:
binky
yes you can play someone in the group stages, then have to play them in the winners bracket, then have to play them again if they come up from the losers bracket...

So its quite likely IF Dag kept on playing and winning in the losers bracket he would have met Reppie AGAIN in the final. He was probably pissed off and couldn't be bothered doing that, winning from the losers bracket is very difficult. Every single time there is a competition confused nerds whine about the double/single elimination.
Monday 05 Jan 2004, 11:31
#19:
it
was clearly that dag is a better skiller quaker than reppie...

at dm6 reppie won by lucky, idem dm2 .. there dag humillate him all time...

only dm4 was clear 4 reppie..

and befere that dag won 2 others games vs him too....

reppie should retire for tourney... all we know that the only KING is dag...

man, come on...
Monday 05 Jan 2004, 11:55
#20:
binky
This was easily the most boring qhlan, I think only if there was a big cash prize would it be more competitive.
Monday 05 Jan 2004, 17:34
#21:
deh
dag in mh on dm4 is rude, im glad he got spanked.
Monday 05 Jan 2004, 18:00
#22:
h0h
"was clearly that dag is a better skiller quaker than reppie..."

I'm glad there are experts like you who can tell the rest of us who is better or more skilled. Now answer this mr. expert: Why does dag use a sorry rj-script while Reppie does not? I would think that being more skilled than Reppie (as you state) he wouldn't have use a script to perform such a simple thing as rj now would he? or why did he bore himself in that dm2 match and gave Reppie a chance to make a turnover?
Monday 05 Jan 2004, 18:27
#23:
Anonymous
dag uses a script because he strives for perfection in all aspects of the game. He doesn't realise that there can be too much control or at least too much focus on it.

Reppie on the other hand plays within the game and abides by it's rules, his focus is on the enemy, he is less rigid because of that and his game is very rewarding regardless of who he plays.

Players less competitive because of lack of prizes, pffft, and how can it be considered boring when it's a QW LAN!?
Monday 05 Jan 2004, 22:21
#24:
Ken
reppie's skillz far exceed dag's. Ok, not far, but at least a bit.
Tuesday 06 Jan 2004, 02:39
#25:
MOTU
That's bull. dag didnt play very well after losing that dm4, prolly cuz he wasnt expecting to lose on it.
Tuesday 06 Jan 2004, 05:32
#26:
terrorhead
You are all wrong. Griffin ownz them all :)
Tuesday 06 Jan 2004, 06:01
#27:
phil
more qh6 1v1s plz

demo.qhlan.org is down :( or hosed :( or no anon :(
Tuesday 06 Jan 2004, 08:08
#28:
Imm
Yea, 1on1 final demos Griffin vs Reppie would be nice :<
Tuesday 06 Jan 2004, 09:25
#29:
serox
som1 pleaee tell me what happand? 1v1, 2v2, 4v4 who was in final of each?

i dont have java plugin at work so cant see from qhlan.org

and no news reported anywhere...
Tuesday 06 Jan 2004, 09:53
#30:
grindcore
Strange that dag had to play reppie again, after he beat him in the group games. To bad that it wasn't dag vs griffin in the final this year too, would be more fun with dm4-dm6-dm2 than 5xDM4 in the final.
Tuesday 06 Jan 2004, 10:37
#31:
Cholo
demos at http://demo.qhlan.org/qhlan6/
Tuesday 06 Jan 2004, 13:02
#32:
binky
If there was 10,000 euro prize for 1st place, this competition would've been alot more interesting, even though that will never happen. I couldnt even watch the final, i just knew griffin was gonna mess about...the only game worth watching was reppie dag, they were the only 2 people who really wanted to win.
Tuesday 06 Jan 2004, 13:39
#33:
xhrl
ser,
1v1 grffn
2v2 gtg
4v4 cmf
Tuesday 06 Jan 2004, 13:52
#34:
nate
@xhrl- looks like we got 1v1 and 2v2 right, but messed up on our 4v4 predictions :>
Tuesday 06 Jan 2004, 17:33
#35:
razor
cs play can be exciting to spectate.. but i think it was really cool that he made it to the final and beating lots of players with +forward style..
and why say +forward isnt competetive? apparntly it worked since he went to final... so why play cs? maybe he would have lost then..
Wednesday 07 Jan 2004, 06:22
#36:
Link
When you play +forward you are dependent on good spawns, at least on dm4. If you play defensive and dont give away easy frags, you still got a chance, even if you spawn bad, because you are not down by 15 frags when you take over.

Griffin spawned RA so much in the final that Reppie just gave up on the last map, cant beat Griffin on dm4 when he spawns like that.

Griffin does one smart thing though: sometimes he dont kill the enemy, even when he can do it, he just damages him, goes and get another RA, and then kills him. If he had killed him, he might have spawned RA when RA was there.

So if you want to be 100% sure that enemy dont get RA, then dont kill him if RA has spawned, take it first :)
Wednesday 07 Jan 2004, 08:32
#37:
Anonymous
It was the speed and timing of Griffins play although obviously spawns are a part of that but not too much when you're playing at the level Griffin played at. He really did figure out how to beat reppie and he did it Griffin style which is really something special. You can see it in Griffin's confident play compared to the WB final. :)
Not available (your browser doesn't seem to support WebGL)